RAMAYAN SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/551/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010145772026

Filing Number

MCRCA/6163/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/551/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMAYAN SAHU

    Adv. BHARAT RAJPUT,ASHOK MISHRA,ASHOK MISHRA, ,ASHOK MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary of MCRCA 551/2026 - Ramayan Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ramayan Sahu, a computer operator accused of criminal breach of trust and related offenses in connection with a shortage of 2420 bags of paddy at a procurement center. The court found that Sahu was engaged only from April 1, 2026, after procurement concluded on January 31, 2026, and that the supervising manager bore primary responsibility. Bail was granted with standard conditions including personal bond, surety, regular court attendance, and prohibition on witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/551/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MCRCA 551/2026 - Ramayan Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ramayan Sahu, a computer operator accused of criminal breach of trust and related offenses in connection with a shortage of 2420 bags of paddy at a procurement center. The court found that Sahu was engaged only from April 1, 2026, after procurement concluded on January 31, 2026, and that the supervising manager bore primary responsibility. Bail was granted with standard conditions including personal bond, surety, regular court attendance, and prohibition on witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case