AJAY KUMAR SINGH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3262/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010145762026

Filing Number

WPS/8414/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3262/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS. ( 606 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY KUMAR SINGH

    Adv. RUDRA PRATAP DUBEY,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL, ,SHESHAV SHEKHAR BARIK,SHESHAV SHEKHAR BARIK,SHESHAV SHEKHAR BARIK,SHESHAV SHEKHAR BARIK,Gaurav Singhal,GOUTAM KHETRAPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Director General of Police

  3. 3.The Inspector General of Police

  4. 4.The Senior Superintendent of Police

  5. 5.The City Superintendent of Police

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS 3262/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted an interim stay on departmental enquiry proceedings against petitioner Ajay Kumar Singh on 16/04/2026. The petitioner challenged an order that set aside his punishment and directed initiation of departmental enquiry, arguing no hearing was provided beforehand. The State was granted four weeks to file its reply, and the case is adjourned for next hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3262/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS 3262/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted an interim stay on departmental enquiry proceedings against petitioner Ajay Kumar Singh on 16/04/2026. The petitioner challenged an order that set aside his punishment and directed initiation of departmental enquiry, arguing no hearing was provided beforehand. The State was granted four weeks to file its reply, and the case is adjourned for next hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case