SWAPNIL MITTAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1058/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010145702026
Filing Number
CRMP/6161/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRMP/1058/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
APPLICATION U/S 528 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1411 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SWAPNIL MITTAL
Adv. Akhand Pratap,NIRAJ BAGHEL,NIRAJ BAGHEL, ,NIRAJ BAGHEL
-
2.Smt. Garima Sharma
-
3.Suresh Kumar Mittal
-
4.Piyush Rathi
-
5.Vikram Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.M/s Amar Steel
Adv. SANGEET KUMAR KUSHWAHA,PRASHANT SAHU SUDHANSHU UPADHYAY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed FIR No. 168/2022 and all consequential criminal proceedings against five petitioners charged under Sections 120B and 420 IPC for alleged non-payment of steel supplies. The court found the dispute was primarily commercial in nature and allowed quashing based on a full settlement agreement executed between parties on 09.12.2025, holding that continuation of proceedings would constitute abuse of process where conviction prospects are remote and the parties have completely resolved their dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1058/2026
The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed FIR No. 168/2022 and all consequential criminal proceedings against five petitioners charged under Sections 120B and 420 IPC for alleged non-payment of steel supplies. The court found the dispute was primarily commercial in nature and allowed quashing based on a full settlement agreement executed between parties on 09.12.2025, holding that continuation of proceedings would constitute abuse of process where conviction prospects are remote and the parties have completely resolved their dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts