AKHLESH TOPPO vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3373/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010145602026

Filing Number

MCRC/6159/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3373/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKHLESH TOPPO

    Adv. Dr. PRACHI DIWAN,DINESH KUMAR YADAV,DINESH KUMAR YADAV, ,ISHWAR PRASAD RATHORE,NARAYAN PRASHAD,SUHAS MEHAR,DINESH KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Akhlesh Toppo, arrested for illegal possession of 24 liters of handmade Mahuwa liquor and 70 kg of Mahuwa Lahan under the C.G. Excise Act. The court considered his clean criminal record, the charge-sheet being filed, prolonged jail custody since February 11, 2026, and the anticipated trial duration, while imposing conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment requests, and compliance with bail undertakings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3373/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Akhlesh Toppo, arrested for illegal possession of 24 liters of handmade Mahuwa liquor and 70 kg of Mahuwa Lahan under the C.G. Excise Act. The court considered his clean criminal record, the charge-sheet being filed, prolonged jail custody since February 11, 2026, and the anticipated trial duration, while imposing conditions including mandatory court attendance, no adjournment requests, and compliance with bail undertakings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case