DILIP JHA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1055/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010145432026
Filing Number
CRMP/6151/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRMP/1055/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
APPLICATION U/S 528 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1411 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DILIP JHA
Adv. Arjit Tiwari,SHIVANSH PARASHER,SHIVANSH PARASHER, ,SAKSHI DEWANGAN,PRATIBHA SAHU,RAMKRISHNA KASHYAP
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
-
3.Astik Sahu
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a petition seeking to quash an FIR and charge-sheet against a university professor for his alleged role in compelling Muslim students to participate in religious activities during an NSS camp. The court held that while the petitioner's claims of absence and lack of operational involvement are notable, such factual disputes cannot be resolved at the pre-trial stage, and sufficient prima facie evidence exists to proceed with trial. The court exercised judicial restraint, applying the *Bhajan Lal* principle that extraordinary powers to quash proceedings are used sparingly and only in exceptional cases of manifest mala fide, and allowed the trial process to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1055/2026
Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a petition seeking to quash an FIR and charge-sheet against a university professor for his alleged role in compelling Muslim students to participate in religious activities during an NSS camp. The court held that while the petitioner's claims of absence and lack of operational involvement are notable, such factual disputes cannot be resolved at the pre-trial stage, and sufficient prima facie evidence exists to proceed with trial. The court exercised judicial restraint, applying the *Bhajan Lal* principle that extraordinary powers to quash proceedings are used sparingly and only in exceptional cases of manifest mala fide, and allowed the trial process to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts