AVINASH KUMAR KHANDEL YASHKARN SINGH, ,MANEE RAM YADAV,SHREYANSH MEHTA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1050/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010145292026

Filing Number

CRMP/6145/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1050/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AVINASH KUMAR KHANDEL YASHKARN SINGH, ,MANEE RAM YADAV,SHREYANSH MEHTA

  2. 2.Devendra Kumar Khandel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Smt. Archana Khandel

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a petition seeking to quash an FIR registered against two brothers for allegedly forging signatures and fraudulently mutating ancestral land revenue records. Applying the *Bhajan Lal* principle, the court held that while the matter involves civil/family aspects, the specific allegations of forgery and manipulation of official records disclose cognizable offences that cannot be summarily dismissed, and the existence of prior civil redressal does not prevent criminal investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1050/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a petition seeking to quash an FIR registered against two brothers for allegedly forging signatures and fraudulently mutating ancestral land revenue records. Applying the *Bhajan Lal* principle, the court held that while the matter involves civil/family aspects, the specific allegations of forgery and manipulation of official records disclose cognizable offences that cannot be summarily dismissed, and the existence of prior civil redressal does not prevent criminal investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case