UMEND DAS BANJARE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3410/2026

Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010144912026

Filing Number

MCRC/6134/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3410/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMEND DAS BANJARE

    Adv. CHANDRIKADITYA PANDEY,ANURAG BAJPAI,ANURAG BAJPAI, ,Kanhaiya Ram Yadav,Kanhaiya Ram Yadav,ANURAG BAJPAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Umend Das Banjare's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as withdrawn at the applicant's counsel's request. The applicant was arrested for alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 64(1), 65 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012, with the victim and her father opposing bail through video conferencing. The court granted liberty to file a fresh application in future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3410/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Umend Das Banjare's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as withdrawn at the applicant's counsel's request. The applicant was arrested for alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 64(1), 65 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012, with the victim and her father opposing bail through video conferencing. The court granted liberty to file a fresh application in future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case