SURAJ PANDEY OFFICE REFERENCE, ,Chandradeep Prasad,RUPESH SHRIVASTAVA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,K.P.S.Gandhi,K.P.S.Gandhi — CRMP/1057/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010144772026
Filing Number
CRMP/6122/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRMP/1057/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO RESTORATION / MODIFICATION / EXTENSION OF TIME IN DECIDED CRIMINAL CASE ( 1450 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURAJ PANDEY OFFICE REFERENCE, ,Chandradeep Prasad,RUPESH SHRIVASTAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,K.P.S.Gandhi,K.P.S.Gandhi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the trial court to complete the criminal trial of Suraj Pandey expeditiously within one month, after the presiding judge's transfer made it inappropriate for him to continue proceedings. The court accepted the trial court's request for extension citing the need for remaining evidence completion and judgment pronouncement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1057/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the trial court to complete the criminal trial of Suraj Pandey expeditiously within one month, after the presiding judge's transfer made it inappropriate for him to continue proceedings. The court accepted the trial court's request for extension citing the need for remaining evidence completion and judgment pronouncement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts