DHARAM SINGH SIDAR vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3401/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010144542026

Filing Number

MCRC/6109/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3401/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHARAM SINGH SIDAR

    Adv. Roop Ram Naik,MANJU NAIK,MANJU NAIK, ,DEVENDRA KUMAR BHARDWAJ,SANGEETA KAUSHIK,ABHISHEK SHARMA,MANJU NAIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Dharam Singh Sidar, arrested for possessing 8.240 kg of ganja under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985. The court allowed bail primarily because the seized quantity was below commercial threshold, the applicant had no similar criminal antecedents, and he had been imprisoned since February 16, 2026, with trial completion expected to take considerable time. Bail was granted subject to strict conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3401/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Dharam Singh Sidar, arrested for possessing 8.240 kg of ganja under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985. The court allowed bail primarily because the seized quantity was below commercial threshold, the applicant had no similar criminal antecedents, and he had been imprisoned since February 16, 2026, with trial completion expected to take considerable time. Bail was granted subject to strict conditions including personal bond with two sureties and mandatory court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case