DEEPAK KUMAR VIDANI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3265/2026

Disposed: Contested--INFRUCTUOUS on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010144162026

Filing Number

WPS/8327/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3265/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS. ( 606 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--INFRUCTUOUS

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK KUMAR VIDANI

    Adv. Ashutosh Mishra,NELSON PANNA,NELSON PANNA, ,NAITIKA SAHU,RUPESH SAHU,NELSON PANNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Director General Of Police

  3. 3.The Inspector General of Police

  4. 4.The Superintendent of Police

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Constable Deepak Kumar Vidani's writ petition as infructuous after the State withdrew the charge sheet order dated 30.03.2026 via an order dated 16.04.2026. Both the petitioner's and State's counsel agreed that the subsequent withdrawal of the charge sheet rendered the writ petition moot, leading to its dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3265/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Constable Deepak Kumar Vidani's writ petition as infructuous after the State withdrew the charge sheet order dated 30.03.2026 via an order dated 16.04.2026. Both the petitioner's and State's counsel agreed that the subsequent withdrawal of the charge sheet rendered the writ petition moot, leading to its dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case