CHHOTURAM CHANDRAVANSHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/999/2026
Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 28th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010143862026
Filing Number
CRA/6075/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRA/999/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
ADHINIYAM, 1990.MATTERS RELATING TO SC & ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989;UNTOUCHABILITY (OFFENCES) AMENDMENT & MISC. PROVISION ACT, 1976. ( 1419 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHHOTURAM CHANDRAVANSHI
Adv. Samir Singh,ARVIND PRASAD,ARVIND PRASAD, ,ASHWELL FRANKLIN,ARVIND PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the criminal appeal of Chhoturam Chandravanshi, a contractor accused under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The appellant was charged with fraudulently obtaining ₹21,50,000 meant for housing construction for scheduled caste beneficiaries and misappropriating the funds without completing the work. The court upheld the trial court's order rejecting the appellant's bail application, finding the charges properly framed and noting that the main accused (the fund recipient) was the appellant himself, distinguishing his case from that of the co-accused technical assistant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRA/999/2026
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the criminal appeal of Chhoturam Chandravanshi, a contractor accused under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The appellant was charged with fraudulently obtaining ₹21,50,000 meant for housing construction for scheduled caste beneficiaries and misappropriating the funds without completing the work. The court upheld the trial court's order rejecting the appellant's bail application, finding the charges properly framed and noting that the main accused (the fund recipient) was the appellant himself, distinguishing his case from that of the co-accused technical assistant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts