SMT. ANKITA AGRAWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1032/2026

Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010143772026

Filing Number

CRMP/6072/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1032/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. ANKITA AGRAWAL

    Adv. Ankur Agrawal,RAZA ALI,RAZA ALI, ,Chandradeep Prasad,RAZA ALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Station House Officer

  3. 3.Smt. Mansi Kaushik

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petitioner's petition seeking to quash an FIR filed against her, finding that the petition suffered from a fatal procedural defect—the non-impleadment of the complainant's husband (the petitioner's brother), who is a necessary party directly affected by the outcome. The court permitted the petitioner to withdraw and refile the petition after impleading all necessary parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1032/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petitioner's petition seeking to quash an FIR filed against her, finding that the petition suffered from a fatal procedural defect—the non-impleadment of the complainant's husband (the petitioner's brother), who is a necessary party directly affected by the outcome. The court permitted the petitioner to withdraw and refile the petition after impleading all necessary parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case