ANIL EKKA JEET PATEL, ,PRABHU LAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3222/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010143402026

Filing Number

WPS/8280/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3222/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL EKKA JEET PATEL, ,PRABHU LAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Engineer in Chief

  3. 3.Chief Engineer

  4. 4.Exeuctive Engineer

  5. 5.Joint Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the petition of Anil Ekka, legal heir of a retired Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employee, who was denied leave encashment benefits. The court, relying on its precedent in Faguvaram Patel v. State of C.G. (2022), permitted the petitioner to submit a fresh representation and directed the respondent state authorities to decide the claim expeditiously within three months in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3222/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the petition of Anil Ekka, legal heir of a retired Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employee, who was denied leave encashment benefits. The court, relying on its precedent in Faguvaram Patel v. State of C.G. (2022), permitted the petitioner to submit a fresh representation and directed the respondent state authorities to decide the claim expeditiously within three months in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case