THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION RISALI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WA/465/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010143152026
Filing Number
WA/8257/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
WA/465/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
COMPULSORY RETIREMENT / RETIREMENT. ( 605 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION RISALI
Adv. N.NAHA ROY,ADITYA GRANDHI,ADITYA GRANDHI, ,Rishabh Gupta
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Municipal Corporation Bhilai distt. durg, C.G.
Adv. RAJESH KUMAR KESHARWANI
-
3.The Additional Commissioner,
-
4.Shatrughan Lal Nayak
Adv. VIPIN TIWARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Summary of WA 465/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Municipal Corporation Risali's appeal, upholding the Single Judge's decision that an Assistant Pump Operator's date of birth (18.08.1961) was erroneously recorded as 18.01.1961 in service records due to clerical error, making his premature retirement illegal. The court found cogent documentary evidence—educational certificates and departmental records—consistently supported the correct date, and directed the corporation to reinstate the employee with back pay, arrears, and 6% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WA/465/2026
Summary of WA 465/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed Municipal Corporation Risali's appeal, upholding the Single Judge's decision that an Assistant Pump Operator's date of birth (18.08.1961) was erroneously recorded as 18.01.1961 in service records due to clerical error, making his premature retirement illegal. The court found cogent documentary evidence—educational certificates and departmental records—consistently supported the correct date, and directed the corporation to reinstate the employee with back pay, arrears, and 6% interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts