LEELADHAR PRASAD SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,SYED MOHAMMAD SOHAIL AFZAL,SYED MOHAMMAD SOHAIL AFZAL — MCRC/3534/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010142472026
Filing Number
MCRC/6033/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRC/3534/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LEELADHAR PRASAD SAHU
Adv. Arpan Verma,Rishabh Gupta,Rishabh Gupta, ,OMPRAKASH GUPTA,KABEER KALWANI,MAYANK GUPTA,SHIVANGI AGRAWAL,SHIVANGI AGRAWAL,SANDEEP PATEL,SHASHWAT MISHRA,ADITYA DHAR DIWAN,Rishabh Gupta
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,SYED MOHAMMAD SOHAIL AFZAL,SYED MOHAMMAD SOHAIL AFZAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Summary of MCRC 3534/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Leeladhar Prasad Sahu in connection with four fraud cases involving share market investment schemes totaling over Rs. 2.5 crore. The court found that co-accused persons received bail in similar cases, the charge-sheet was already filed, and the applicant had been in custody since March 2026 with trial conclusion likely taking considerable time. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including mandatory personal appearance at trial proceedings, no adjournment requests during witness testimony, and provisions for bail cancellation upon violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/3534/2026
Summary of MCRC 3534/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Leeladhar Prasad Sahu in connection with four fraud cases involving share market investment schemes totaling over Rs. 2.5 crore. The court found that co-accused persons received bail in similar cases, the charge-sheet was already filed, and the applicant had been in custody since March 2026 with trial conclusion likely taking considerable time. Bail was granted with stringent conditions including mandatory personal appearance at trial proceedings, no adjournment requests during witness testimony, and provisions for bail cancellation upon violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts