SMT. NANDANI KASHYAP vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4215/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010142182026

Filing Number

MCRC/6011/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/4215/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. NANDANI KASHYAP

    Adv. Pradeep Kumar Jogi,ASHOK KUMAR KOMRA,ASHOK KUMAR KOMRA, ,G.P.MATHUR,ASHOK KUMAR KOMRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/4215/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Smt. Nandani Kashyap's bail application. The court found that 6.095 kg of Ganja was seized from her possession under Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act, and she had a pending criminal antecedent under NDPS from 2022, establishing her as a habitual offender. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court deemed her unsuitable for regular bail, though directed the trial court to proceed expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/4215/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/4215/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected Smt. Nandani Kashyap's bail application. The court found that 6.095 kg of Ganja was seized from her possession under Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act, and she had a pending criminal antecedent under NDPS from 2022, establishing her as a habitual offender. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court deemed her unsuitable for regular bail, though directed the trial court to proceed expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case