STATE OF CHHATTISGARH vs MAMTA CHOUDHARY Advocate - AWADH TRIPATHI — WA/400/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010142042026
Filing Number
WA/8204/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
WA/400/2026
Registration Date
25-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
TRANSFER MATTERS. ( 617 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Adv. A.G.
-
2.Additional Secretary
-
3.Director Urban Administration And Development Department
-
4.The Collector Raigarh
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAMTA CHOUDHARY Advocate - AWADH TRIPATHI
-
2.Chandra Prakash Shrivastava
Adv. N.NAHA ROY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: WA/400/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the State's appeal against a lower court order that had quashed disciplinary actions against municipal employees Mamta Choudhary and Chandra Prakash Shrivastava. The court rejected the State's application to condone a 283-day delay in filing the appeal, finding no satisfactory or cogent explanation for the late filing. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court held that administrative procedures and multi-level approvals do not constitute sufficient cause to excuse such significant delay, particularly where the appellant failed to demonstrate compelling reasons justifying condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WA/400/2026
Case Summary: WA/400/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the State's appeal against a lower court order that had quashed disciplinary actions against municipal employees Mamta Choudhary and Chandra Prakash Shrivastava. The court rejected the State's application to condone a 283-day delay in filing the appeal, finding no satisfactory or cogent explanation for the late filing. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court held that administrative procedures and multi-level approvals do not constitute sufficient cause to excuse such significant delay, particularly where the appellant failed to demonstrate compelling reasons justifying condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts