LEELADHAR PRASAD SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3467/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010142032026

Filing Number

MCRC/6000/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3467/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LEELADHAR PRASAD SAHU

    Adv. Arpan Verma,Rishabh Gupta,Rishabh Gupta, ,OMPRAKASH GUPTA,KABEER KALWANI,MAYANK GUPTA,SANDEEP PATEL,SANDEEP PATEL,SHASHWAT MISHRA,ADITYA DHAR DIWAN,Rishabh Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: MCRC/3467/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Leeladhar Prasad Sahu in four consolidated cases (MCRC 3365, 3467, 3534, and 3891 of 2026) involving allegations of investment fraud. The applicant was accused of participating in a Ponzi scheme where he and co-accused offered victims guaranteed returns on share market investments totaling over Rs. 2.5 crore, then failed to return the principal amounts. The court allowed bail on personal bond with two sureties, considering that co-accused in identical cases had already been granted bail, chargesheet was filed, and prolonged trial duration warranted release pending trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3467/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: MCRC/3467/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Leeladhar Prasad Sahu in four consolidated cases (MCRC 3365, 3467, 3534, and 3891 of 2026) involving allegations of investment fraud. The applicant was accused of participating in a Ponzi scheme where he and co-accused offered victims guaranteed returns on share market investments totaling over Rs. 2.5 crore, then failed to return the principal amounts. The court allowed bail on personal bond with two sureties, considering that co-accused in identical cases had already been granted bail, chargesheet was filed, and prolonged trial duration warranted release pending trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case