SAMPAT KUMAR SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/577/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010141922026

Filing Number

MCRCA/5991/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/577/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMPAT KUMAR SAHU

    Adv. Satya Prakash Verma,RUBY VERMA,RUBY VERMA, ,AJAY KUMAR CHANDRA,AJAY KUMAR CHANDRA,AJAY KUMAR CHANDRA,Manisha Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRCA 577/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Sampat Kumar Sahu and Tulsinand Sahu in a fraud case involving Rs. 81 lakh allegedly taken for share market investment that was never returned. The court allowed the bail application despite the applicants' criminal antecedents (3 and 4 prior offences respectively), noting that co-accused persons had already received anticipatory bail. The applicants were released on personal bond with standard conditions including non-interference with witnesses, court appearances, and abstention from similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/577/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRCA 577/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Sampat Kumar Sahu and Tulsinand Sahu in a fraud case involving Rs. 81 lakh allegedly taken for share market investment that was never returned. The court allowed the bail application despite the applicants' criminal antecedents (3 and 4 prior offences respectively), noting that co-accused persons had already received anticipatory bail. The applicants were released on personal bond with standard conditions including non-interference with witnesses, court appearances, and abstention from similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case