Lorik Yadav vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1060/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010141882026
Filing Number
CRMP/5989/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRMP/1060/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lorik Yadav
Adv. VIKRAM SINGH VISHWAKARMA,KAUSHALYA YADAV,KAUSHALYA YADAV, ,KAUSHALYA YADAV
-
2.Baby Yadav
-
3.Rajesh Kumar Yadav
-
4.Lalbahadur Yadav
-
5.Parmila Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Smt. Sindhu Yadav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: CRMP/1060/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition filed by Lorik Yadav, Baby Yadav, and Rajesh Kumar Yadav, who sought to quash FIR No. 0002/2026 registered under Sections 85 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita 2023. The court allowed withdrawal of the petition with liberty to refile after impleading the husband as an additional petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1060/2026
Case Summary: CRMP/1060/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition filed by Lorik Yadav, Baby Yadav, and Rajesh Kumar Yadav, who sought to quash FIR No. 0002/2026 registered under Sections 85 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita 2023. The court allowed withdrawal of the petition with liberty to refile after impleading the husband as an additional petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts