SINGHRAI KUMETI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3419/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010141842026

Filing Number

MCRC/5985/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3419/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SINGHRAI KUMETI

    Adv. Nishi Kant Sinha,SHAKTI RAJ SINHA,SHAKTI RAJ SINHA, ,SHAKTI RAJ SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/3419/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Singhrai Kumeti, a BSF personnel arrested for offenses under Sections 332(B) and 64(2)(m) BNS, involving allegations of establishing physical relations under false marriage pretense with a married woman. Key Reasoning: The court found that the victim was a major adult who remained in a consensual relationship with the applicant from 2023 onwards and was aware of his marital status; the dispute arose when the relationship couldn't materialize into matrimony. Given the applicant's custody since February 10, 2026, the already-filed chargesheet, and anticipated lengthy trial, the court deemed bail appropriate without commenting on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3419/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/3419/2026 Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Singhrai Kumeti, a BSF personnel arrested for offenses under Sections 332(B) and 64(2)(m) BNS, involving allegations of establishing physical relations under false marriage pretense with a married woman. Key Reasoning: The court found that the victim was a major adult who remained in a consensual relationship with the applicant from 2023 onwards and was aware of his marital status; the dispute arose when the relationship couldn't materialize into matrimony. Given the applicant's custody since February 10, 2026, the already-filed chargesheet, and anticipated lengthy trial, the court deemed bail appropriate without commenting on case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case