SMT. SUKHWANTIN DHRITLAHARE (Satnami) RAKESH KUMAR THAKUR, ,SHASHI BHUSAN TIWARI vs Malgeram Nishad @ Ranjeet — MAC/883/2020
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010141692020
Filing Number
MAC/7207/2020
Filing Date
24-Jun-2020
Registration No
MAC/883/2020
Registration Date
17-Jul-2020
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. SUKHWANTIN DHRITLAHARE (Satnami) RAKESH KUMAR THAKUR, ,SHASHI BHUSAN TIWARI
-
2.Pinki Tandan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Malgeram Nishad @ Ranjeet
-
2.Smt. Gyanti R. Giri
-
3.The New India Inurance Co. Ltd.
Adv. Samir Singh
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
12-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
Summary: In MAC No. 883 of 2020, the High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the appellant's application for condonation of 327 days' delay in filing the appeal and admitted the appeal for hearing on its merits. Subsequently, the court also condoned the delay in payment of process fee and directed the office to proceed with the case, with the matter listed for final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
-
21-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF
-
23-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
03-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
13-Aug-2020
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal
-
22-Jul-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
22-Jul-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2020
Case filed
Registration No. MAC/883/2020
Summary: In MAC No. 883 of 2020, the High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the appellant's application for condonation of 327 days' delay in filing the appeal and admitted the appeal for hearing on its merits. Subsequently, the court also condoned the delay in payment of process fee and directed the office to proceed with the case, with the matter listed for final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts