LEELADHAR PRASAD SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3365/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010141382026

Filing Number

MCRC/5966/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3365/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LEELADHAR PRASAD SAHU

    Adv. Arpan Verma,Rishabh Gupta,Rishabh Gupta, ,OMPRAKASH GUPTA,SANDEEP PATEL,SHASHWAT MISHRA,KABEER KALWANI,ADITYA DHAR DIWAN,MAYANK GUPTA,Rishabh Gupta,Rishabh Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to applicant Leeladhar Prasad Sahu in four criminal cases involving alleged investment fraud through share market trading schemes where complainants were promised returns but funds were not repaid. The court allowed bail based on the facts that co-accused persons had already been granted bail in similar cases, the charge-sheet had been filed, the applicant had no prior criminal history, and trial conclusion would take considerable time, imposing strict conditions including personal attendance, no adjournment-seeking when witnesses are present, and penalties for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3365/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to applicant Leeladhar Prasad Sahu in four criminal cases involving alleged investment fraud through share market trading schemes where complainants were promised returns but funds were not repaid. The court allowed bail based on the facts that co-accused persons had already been granted bail in similar cases, the charge-sheet had been filed, the applicant had no prior criminal history, and trial conclusion would take considerable time, imposing strict conditions including personal attendance, no adjournment-seeking when witnesses are present, and penalties for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case