SMT. PRABHA VERMA vs ANAND VERMA — CR/93/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010141232026

Filing Number

CR/8166/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CR/93/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

REVISION UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE C.P.C. ( 1722 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. PRABHA VERMA

    Adv. REKHRAJ BAGHEL,Bharat Lal Sahu,Bharat Lal Sahu, ,Bharat Lal Sahu

  2. 2.Smt. Yashoda Verma

  3. 3.Mukesh Verma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANAND VERMA

  2. 2.State Of Chhattisgarh

    Adv. A. G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the defendants' civil revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of their application to dismiss the plaintiff's suit on limitation grounds. The court held that whether the cause of action arose in 2003 (oral partition), 2013 (written partition deed), or 2016 (unauthorized mutation after death) is a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence, precluding rejection at the pleading stage. The trial court's order was affirmed with directions to frame a specific limitation issue for decision after recording parties' evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/93/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the defendants' civil revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of their application to dismiss the plaintiff's suit on limitation grounds. The court held that whether the cause of action arose in 2003 (oral partition), 2013 (written partition deed), or 2016 (unauthorized mutation after death) is a mixed question of law and fact requiring evidence, precluding rejection at the pleading stage. The trial court's order was affirmed with directions to frame a specific limitation issue for decision after recording parties' evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case