SIDDHARTH SHUKLA vs TARKESHWARI SHUKLA Advocate - Tarendra Kumar Jha, ,Bhaskar Jha,Narayan Prasad Thakur,TAPAN KUMAR CHANDRA,Narayan Prasad Thakur,Narayan Prasad Thakur — FA/95/2025

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010140992025

Filing Number

FA/7890/2025

Filing Date

08-Apr-2025

Registration No

FA/95/2025

Registration Date

28-Apr-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION ( 1716 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIDDHARTH SHUKLA

    Adv. PRAVEEN DHURANDHAR,PRAHLAD SHRIVAS,PRAHLAD SHRIVAS, ,N.S.DHURANDHAR,PRAHLAD SHRIVAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TARKESHWARI SHUKLA Advocate - Tarendra Kumar Jha, ,Bhaskar Jha,Narayan Prasad Thakur,TAPAN KUMAR CHANDRA,Narayan Prasad Thakur,Narayan Prasad Thakur

  2. 2.Alka Shukla

  3. 3.State of Chhattisgarh

    Adv. A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the appeal and set aside the trial court's order rejecting the plaintiff's suit for insufficient court fee payment. Finding no deliberate default (the plaintiff had offered to pay 50% immediately and requested time for the balance), the court held that Order 7 Rule 11(c) of CPC should be applied pragmatically in the interest of justice. The court remanded the matter to the trial court, granting the plaintiff a final opportunity to deposit the full court fee by June 17, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  4. 22-Feb-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes] ( Dormant Case )

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey , Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  6. 24-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  7. 14-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  8. 30-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey,Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  9. 30-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 08-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FA/95/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the appeal and set aside the trial court's order rejecting the plaintiff's suit for insufficient court fee payment. Finding no deliberate default (the plaintiff had offered to pay 50% immediately and requested time for the balance), the court held that Order 7 Rule 11(c) of CPC should be applied pragmatically in the interest of justice. The court remanded the matter to the trial court, granting the plaintiff a final opportunity to deposit the full court fee by June 17, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case