HEMLAL RATHIYA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3286/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010140932026

Filing Number

MCRC/5938/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3286/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEMLAL RATHIYA

    Adv. AJEET KUMAR YADAV,ATUL GAVEL,ATUL GAVEL, ,MAHANT KUMAR JAYSWAL,LAXMI GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Hemlal Rathiya, a 19-year-old accused of illegal possession of 70 liters of Mahua liquor under the C.G. Excise Act. The court approved bail based on his clean criminal record, absence of a chargesheet filing, and prolonged incarceration since March 23, 2026, conditioning release on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment-seeking during witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3286/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Hemlal Rathiya, a 19-year-old accused of illegal possession of 70 liters of Mahua liquor under the C.G. Excise Act. The court approved bail based on his clean criminal record, absence of a chargesheet filing, and prolonged incarceration since March 23, 2026, conditioning release on personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including mandatory court attendance and no adjournment-seeking during witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case