RAJIV VISHWAKARMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3283/2026

Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010140882026

Filing Number

MCRC/5935/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3283/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJIV VISHWAKARMA

    Adv. PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,KISHAN GENDLE,KISHAN GENDLE, ,YOGESH KUMAR,YOGESH KUMAR,Anchal Kumar Matre,Anchal Kumar Matre,PRANOTI DAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a bail application filed by Rajiv Vishwakarma in a POCSO Act case after the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw it. The court had initially admitted the application and directed notice to the victim/complainant to appear and present their objections, which they did through video conferencing on the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3283/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a bail application filed by Rajiv Vishwakarma in a POCSO Act case after the applicant's counsel sought permission to withdraw it. The court had initially admitted the application and directed notice to the victim/complainant to appear and present their objections, which they did through video conferencing on the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case