SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA OFFICE REFERENCE, ,Sachidanand Yadav vs DIRECTOR INCHARGE Advocate - KASHIF SHAKEEL, ,Sachidanand Yadav,Sachidanand Yadav — MCC/349/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010140762026
Filing Number
MCC/8146/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCC/349/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA OFFICE REFERENCE, ,Sachidanand Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.DIRECTOR INCHARGE Advocate - KASHIF SHAKEEL, ,Sachidanand Yadav,Sachidanand Yadav
-
2.Chief General manager Mines IO (Investigating Officer) And F loc (CGM)
-
3.Deputy General Manager Hirri Mines
-
4.The Cpio
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh accepted the recusal of Justice T.P. Sharma, the originally appointed sole arbitrator in an arbitration matter between Sanjay Kumar Gupta and Bhilai Steel Plant, due to his post-surgery recovery and urgent health concerns. The court appointed retired District Court Judge Prabhat Shastri as the new sole arbitrator with the consent of both parties, and disposed of the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCC/349/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh accepted the recusal of Justice T.P. Sharma, the originally appointed sole arbitrator in an arbitration matter between Sanjay Kumar Gupta and Bhilai Steel Plant, due to his post-surgery recovery and urgent health concerns. The court appointed retired District Court Judge Prabhat Shastri as the new sole arbitrator with the consent of both parties, and disposed of the case accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts