DEV KUMAR CHANDRA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3183/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010140672026

Filing Number

WPS/8142/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3183/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES ( 630 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEV KUMAR CHANDRA

    Adv. JEET RAM PATEL,PRABHU LAL,PRABHU LAL, ,PRABHU LAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

  3. 3.JOINT DIRECTOR

  4. 4.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

  5. 5.BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER

  6. 6.COLLECTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Dev Kumar Chandra, an Assistant Teacher, with a direction to the District Education Officer (Respondent No.4) to decide his pending representation dated 28.10.2025 regarding payment of 50% salary for the suspension period (10.6.2022 to 01.12.2022) in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within three months. The petitioner did not press the case on merits and sought only this procedural direction, which the respondents did not oppose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3183/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Dev Kumar Chandra, an Assistant Teacher, with a direction to the District Education Officer (Respondent No.4) to decide his pending representation dated 28.10.2025 regarding payment of 50% salary for the suspension period (10.6.2022 to 01.12.2022) in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within three months. The petitioner did not press the case on merits and sought only this procedural direction, which the respondents did not oppose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case