UPENDRA VATTI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/550/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010140612026

Filing Number

MCRCA/5925/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/550/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UPENDRA VATTI

    Adv. RAKESH KUMAR MANIKPURI,ARYA SHRIVASTAVA,ARYA SHRIVASTAVA, ,SANDEEP SHRIVASTAVA,SWEKSHA SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Upendra Vatti in a sexual assault case (Crime No. 35/2026) under Section 69 of the BNS, finding the relationship consensual after he was previously acquitted in a similar 2022 case filed by the same prosecutrix. The court concluded that since the victim was a major and had lodged an FIR for the same alleged offense where the applicant was acquitted, the present complaint appeared to stem from a failed consensual relationship rather than a criminal act. Bail was granted with standard conditions including appearance in court and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/550/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Upendra Vatti in a sexual assault case (Crime No. 35/2026) under Section 69 of the BNS, finding the relationship consensual after he was previously acquitted in a similar 2022 case filed by the same prosecutrix. The court concluded that since the victim was a major and had lodged an FIR for the same alleged offense where the applicant was acquitted, the present complaint appeared to stem from a failed consensual relationship rather than a criminal act. Bail was granted with standard conditions including appearance in court and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case