KESHWAR YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3431/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010140582026
Filing Number
MCRC/5922/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRC/3431/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KESHWAR YADAV
Adv. SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA,NEELESH JAISWAL,NEELESH JAISWAL, ,RAJENDRA PATEL,HEMLATA YADAV,NEELESH JAISWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to 67-year-old Keshwar Yadav, arrested for allegedly assaulting a complainant with weapons during a family dispute over a wedding function. The court considered that co-accused persons were already bailed, many prior criminal cases against the applicant were disposed of, and his prolonged custody since February 2026 warranted release. Bail was conditional on personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance including regular court attendance, no adjournment-seeking, and mandatory presence at critical trial stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/3431/2026
The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to 67-year-old Keshwar Yadav, arrested for allegedly assaulting a complainant with weapons during a family dispute over a wedding function. The court considered that co-accused persons were already bailed, many prior criminal cases against the applicant were disposed of, and his prolonged custody since February 2026 warranted release. Bail was conditional on personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance including regular court attendance, no adjournment-seeking, and mandatory presence at critical trial stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts