JHAGRU vs SONKUWAR BAI Advocate - PUNIT RUPAREL, ,KALPESH RUPAREL — WP227/364/2024

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010140122024

Filing Number

WP227/8172/2024

Filing Date

22-Apr-2024

Registration No

WP227/364/2024

Registration Date

26-Apr-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JHAGRU

    Adv. SHUBHANK TIWARI,RAKESH KUMAR KASHYAP,RAKESH KUMAR KASHYAP, ,ADITYA CHOPRA,RAKESH KUMAR KASHYAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SONKUWAR BAI Advocate - PUNIT RUPAREL, ,KALPESH RUPAREL

  2. 2.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

    Adv. A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: WP227/364/2024 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Jhagru's writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the underlying civil suit had already been decided by the trial court. Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal found no further purpose in entertaining the petition given this development. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  4. 30-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  5. 30-Apr-2024

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

  6. 22-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP227/364/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP227/364/2024 The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed Jhagru's writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the underlying civil suit had already been decided by the trial court. Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal found no further purpose in entertaining the petition given this development. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case