RAMESH KUMAR DANSENA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3259/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010140012026
Filing Number
WPS/8091/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPS/3259/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMESH KUMAR DANSENA
Adv. F.S.KHARE,MAMTA MAHILANGE,MAMTA MAHILANGE, ,RAM KUMAR TIWARI,NILU KUMARI SINGH,MAMTA MAHILANGE
-
2.Laxmi Narayan Bareth
-
3.Heeralal Patel
-
4.Ram Kumar Dansena
-
5.Dharampal Singh Chhatri
-
6.Ramhaiya Lal Dubey
-
7.Mohd. Ibrahim
-
8.Dilchand Sahu
-
9.Khageshwar Singh Patel
-
10.Suresh Kumar Nishad
-
11.Ramchandra Dubey
-
12.Smt. Yashoda Nishad
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.State of Chhattisgarh
-
3.State of Chhattisgarh
-
4.Engineer in Chief
-
5.Chief Engineer
-
6.Executive Engineer
-
7.Executive Engineer
-
8.Joint Director
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition filed by 12 Water Resources Department employees seeking pay scale revision and arrears dating to their initial appointment. The Court directed the petitioners to file fresh comprehensive representations before the concerned authorities, which must be considered and decided within 6 months in light of the 1982 notification and relevant judicial precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3259/2026
The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition filed by 12 Water Resources Department employees seeking pay scale revision and arrears dating to their initial appointment. The Court directed the petitioners to file fresh comprehensive representations before the concerned authorities, which must be considered and decided within 6 months in light of the 1982 notification and relevant judicial precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts