REETA YADAV vs GOURISHANKAR YADAV — MAC/821/2020

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010139832020

Filing Number

MAC/7137/2020

Filing Date

22-Jun-2020

Registration No

MAC/821/2020

Registration Date

25-Jun-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.REETA YADAV

    Adv. D.N.PRAJAPATI,bishnu muni,bishnu muni, ,Bishnu Muni

  2. 2.Prashant Kumar Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOURISHANKAR YADAV

  2. 2.Heeralal Yadav

  3. 3.Chola Mandalam Insurance Company Limited

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: MAC No. 821/2020 (Reeta Yadav v. Gourishankar Yadav) was admitted by the High Court of Chhattisgarh on 29.06.2020. Notice was issued to respondents, and the case was consolidated with MAC No. 863/2020. As of 11.05.2026, the respondent Insurance Company (Chola Mandalam) had not appeared; the court directed advocate Ghanshyam Patel to accept notice on their behalf and scheduled the matter for listing after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  4. 04-Jul-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF

  5. 29-Jun-2020

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF

  6. 29-Jun-2020

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal

  7. 22-Jun-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/821/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: MAC No. 821/2020 (Reeta Yadav v. Gourishankar Yadav) was admitted by the High Court of Chhattisgarh on 29.06.2020. Notice was issued to respondents, and the case was consolidated with MAC No. 863/2020. As of 11.05.2026, the respondent Insurance Company (Chola Mandalam) had not appeared; the court directed advocate Ghanshyam Patel to accept notice on their behalf and scheduled the matter for listing after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case