BEERU NAG vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3237/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010139792026

Filing Number

MCRC/5898/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3237/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

NDPS Act ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BEERU NAG

    Adv. SUNIL SAHU,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA, ,SAHIL SAHU,RAJENDRA PATEL,SUMIT SHRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Beeru Nag, arrested for possessing 9.640 kg of ganja under the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found that the quantity recovered was below the commercial threshold (20 kg), the applicant had no prior NDPS convictions, and prolonged incarceration since January 2026 pending trial completion was unjustified. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties and strict court attendance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3237/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Beeru Nag, arrested for possessing 9.640 kg of ganja under the NDPS Act, 1985. The court found that the quantity recovered was below the commercial threshold (20 kg), the applicant had no prior NDPS convictions, and prolonged incarceration since January 2026 pending trial completion was unjustified. Bail was granted with conditions including personal bond with two sureties and strict court attendance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case