MOHD. FAJIL @ FAAJIL vs JIYAUL MUSTAFA @ PAPPU — MAC/692/2023

Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

CNR: CGHC010139652023

Filing Number

MAC/7901/2023

Filing Date

25-Apr-2023

Registration No

MAC/692/2023

Registration Date

01-May-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTERS ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. ( 1204 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. FAJIL @ FAAJIL

    Adv. Dashrath Kushwaha,PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL,PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL, ,Nand Kumari Kashyap,Pawan Kumar Kashyap,PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JIYAUL MUSTAFA @ PAPPU

  2. 2.Chandrika Prasad Yadav

  3. 3.Branch Manager

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Case Summary - MAC No. 692/2023 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the hearing on 07/05/2026. No counsel appeared for the appellant or Respondent No. 2 (though notice was served). Notices to Respondents No. 1 and 3 remained unserved. The matter was adjourned and listed for hearing in the week commencing 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF

  5. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF

  6. 20-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. AgrawalView PDF

  7. 03-May-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

  8. 03-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. MAC/692/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - MAC No. 692/2023 The High Court of Chhattisgarh adjourned the hearing on 07/05/2026. No counsel appeared for the appellant or Respondent No. 2 (though notice was served). Notices to Respondents No. 1 and 3 remained unserved. The matter was adjourned and listed for hearing in the week commencing 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case