HEERASINGH YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3421/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010139602026

Filing Number

MCRC/5888/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3421/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEERASINGH YADAV

    Adv. JAYA GUPTA,Aman tamboli,Aman tamboli, ,Aman tamboli

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/3421/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of 19-year-old Heerasingh Yadav, who was arrested for alleged rape of a minor girl belonging to Scheduled Tribe category, abduction, and offences under POCSO Act. Justice Radhakishan Agrawal found the nature and gravity of the offence precluded bail despite the victim's parents raising no objection through video conferencing and the applicant's argument of prolonged detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3421/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/3421/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of 19-year-old Heerasingh Yadav, who was arrested for alleged rape of a minor girl belonging to Scheduled Tribe category, abduction, and offences under POCSO Act. Justice Radhakishan Agrawal found the nature and gravity of the offence precluded bail despite the victim's parents raising no objection through video conferencing and the applicant's argument of prolonged detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case