ROPNA RAM NAGASIA vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1670/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010139442026

Filing Number

WPC/8063/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/1670/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENCROACHMENTS ON GOVERNMENT LAND AND DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS. ( 1708 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROPNA RAM NAGASIA

    Adv. VIVEK BHAKTA,A.N.BHAKTA,A.N.BHAKTA, ,A.N.BHAKTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Secretary

  3. 3.The Collector

  4. 4.The District Forest Officer

  5. 5.The Sub Divisional Officer (Forest)

  6. 6.The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev)

  7. 7.The Forest Range Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Court Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of 16 writ petitions filed by landless persons challenging forest land eviction notices. While upholding that encroachment on reserved forest is unlawful, the court recognized the petitioners' right to shelter under constitutional principles and directed them to pursue settlement under the Forest Rights Act, 2006 within 30 days. The court stayed coercive action pending consideration of their claims by authorities in a pragmatic manner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1670/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of 16 writ petitions filed by landless persons challenging forest land eviction notices. While upholding that encroachment on reserved forest is unlawful, the court recognized the petitioners' right to shelter under constitutional principles and directed them to pursue settlement under the Forest Rights Act, 2006 within 30 days. The court stayed coercive action pending consideration of their claims by authorities in a pragmatic manner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case