SHRIKRISHNA PRASAD KUNWAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3254/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010139302026
Filing Number
WPS/8053/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPS/3254/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO POSTING / ATTACHMENT / RELIEVING / JOINING MATTER ( 633 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIKRISHNA PRASAD KUNWAR
Adv. A.N.PANDEY,SMT. SAPNA PANDEY,SMT. SAPNA PANDEY, ,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA,NEERAJ CHOUBEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Director
-
3.Commissioner Surguja
-
4.Joint Director
-
5.Collector Surajpur
-
6.District Education Officer
-
7.Block Education Officer
-
8.The Principal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court directed the State Level Committee to reconsider a school headmaster's representation against his transfer under the Rationalization Policy on merits, finding that the Committee's prior rejection based on technical grounds (lack of prior approach to Divisional Level Committee) violated the Court's earlier orders. The Court held that the State Level Committee must comply with judicial directions and adjudicate the grievance substantively within two weeks, rather than dismiss it on procedural grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3254/2026
Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court directed the State Level Committee to reconsider a school headmaster's representation against his transfer under the Rationalization Policy on merits, finding that the Committee's prior rejection based on technical grounds (lack of prior approach to Divisional Level Committee) violated the Court's earlier orders. The Court held that the State Level Committee must comply with judicial directions and adjudicate the grievance substantively within two weeks, rather than dismiss it on procedural grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts