SMT. GAYATRI YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1681/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: CGHC010139172026

Filing Number

WPC/8041/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/1681/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. GAYATRI YADAV

    Adv. SUNIL TRIPATHI,Apoorva Tripathi,Apoorva Tripathi, ,ABHINAV DUBEY,Varsha Sharma,Varsha Sharma,Apoorva Tripathi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Collecor

  3. 3.Chief Executive Officer

  4. 4.Chief Executive Officer -

    Adv. ANIL S.PANDEY,BHUPENDRA SHRIVAS

  5. 5.Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)

  6. 6.The Tahsildar

  7. 7.The Executive Engineer

  8. 8.The Sarpanch

  9. 9.The Secretary

  10. 10.Udit Aayam

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    SUMMARY: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim relief on the petition filed by Smt. Gayatri Yadav (Up-Sarpanch) challenging illegal construction of a Panchayat Bhawan on private land (Khasra No. 170). The court found the construction violated state rules and stayed all further construction on the disputed land until the next hearing. Notice was issued to remaining respondents, and the State was granted time to file its response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1681/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted interim relief on the petition filed by Smt. Gayatri Yadav (Up-Sarpanch) challenging illegal construction of a Panchayat Bhawan on private land (Khasra No. 170). The court found the construction violated state rules and stayed all further construction on the disputed land until the next hearing. Notice was issued to remaining respondents, and the State was granted time to file its response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case