HRIDAY SINGH MARKO @ HRIDAY LAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3424/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010139132026
Filing Number
MCRC/5875/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRC/3424/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HRIDAY SINGH MARKO @ HRIDAY LAL
Adv. AKATH KUMAR YADAV,SANJAY KUMAR YADAV,SANJAY KUMAR YADAV, ,SANSKRITI PAWAR,KUSUM LALCHANDANI,KUSUM LALCHANDANI,NIKHIL KUMAR SAHU,NAVNEET KUMAR YADAV,Arti Pritam Yadav,SANJAY KUMAR YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF
Case Summary: MCRC/3424/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Hriday Singh Marko, accused of murdering his wife Rupan Bai (IPC §302 & 201), finding the gravity of the offense and its commission in the matrimonial home warrant continued detention. Though 14 of 27 prosecution witnesses examined had not fully supported the prosecution's case, the court declined bail as trial was ongoing and refrained from evaluating evidence at the bail stage, instead directing expedited trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF
-
22-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/3424/2026
Case Summary: MCRC/3424/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Hriday Singh Marko, accused of murdering his wife Rupan Bai (IPC §302 & 201), finding the gravity of the offense and its commission in the matrimonial home warrant continued detention. Though 14 of 27 prosecution witnesses examined had not fully supported the prosecution's case, the court declined bail as trial was ongoing and refrained from evaluating evidence at the bail stage, instead directing expedited trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts