VIJAY DUBEY vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRA/781/2025
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: CGHC010139122025
Filing Number
CRA/6120/2025
Filing Date
07-Apr-2025
Registration No
CRA/781/2025
Registration Date
16-Apr-2025
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SEXUAL HARASSMENT, KIDNAPPING & ABDUCTION. ( 1404 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAY DUBEY
Adv. SHUBHANK TIWARI,VIVIK MISHRA,VIVIK MISHRA, ,Shubham Tripathi,INDIRA TRIPATHI,INDIRA TRIPATHI,AWADH TRIPATHI,RAKESH KUMAR KASHYAP,ADITYA CHOPRA,Anurag Singh,ADITYA DHAR DIWAN,ADITYA DHAR DIWAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the appellant Vijay Dubey's application for suspension of sentence and bail in a POCSO case (CRA No. 781 of 2025). The appellant was convicted under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and sentenced to 20 years rigorous imprisonment for raping a minor girl. The Court found the victim's testimony cogent and corroborated by medical evidence and witness statements, and determined no grounds warranted suspending the sentence at the interlocutory stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Jun-2025
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
-
25-Jun-2025
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
-
07-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRA/781/2025
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the appellant Vijay Dubey's application for suspension of sentence and bail in a POCSO case (CRA No. 781 of 2025). The appellant was convicted under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and sentenced to 20 years rigorous imprisonment for raping a minor girl. The Court found the victim's testimony cogent and corroborated by medical evidence and witness statements, and determined no grounds warranted suspending the sentence at the interlocutory stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts