MOHD. DILSAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1678/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010139022026

Filing Number

WPC/8028/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/1678/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO ENCROACHMENTS ON GOVERNMENT LAND AND DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS. ( 1708 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. DILSAD

    Adv. VIVEK BHAKTA,A.N.BHAKTA,A.N.BHAKTA, ,A.N.BHAKTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Secretary ,

  3. 3.The Collector,

  4. 4.The District Forest Officer (Forest),

  5. 5.The Sub Divisional Officer (Forest),

  6. 6.The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.),

  7. 7.The Forest Range Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed multiple consolidated writ petitions challenging forest land eviction notices, holding that while landless persons cannot illegally occupy reserved forest land, they must exhaust statutory remedies under the Forest Rights Act, 2006 before court intervention. The court directed the petitioners to apply before competent authorities within 30 days and suspended coercive eviction action pending resolution of their claims through proper legal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/1678/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed multiple consolidated writ petitions challenging forest land eviction notices, holding that while landless persons cannot illegally occupy reserved forest land, they must exhaust statutory remedies under the Forest Rights Act, 2006 before court intervention. The court directed the petitioners to apply before competent authorities within 30 days and suspended coercive eviction action pending resolution of their claims through proper legal channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case