SUBHAM AGRAWAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/535/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010138872026

Filing Number

MCRCA/5870/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/535/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHAM AGRAWAL

    Adv. SHAKTI RAJ SINHA,Nishi Kant Sinha,Nishi Kant Sinha, ,Durga Mehar,PAVAS SHARMA,Nishi Kant Sinha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to Subham Agrawal in a case involving alleged seduction under Section 64(2)(M) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that the victim was a major who had consensual relations with the applicant since 2015, and the FIR was lodged only when the relationship failed to materialize into marriage. The applicant was released on bail with standard conditions including appearing before the trial court and not tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/535/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to Subham Agrawal in a case involving alleged seduction under Section 64(2)(M) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that the victim was a major who had consensual relations with the applicant since 2015, and the FIR was lodged only when the relationship failed to materialize into marriage. The applicant was released on bail with standard conditions including appearing before the trial court and not tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case