SHANIRAM MAHANT vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3382/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010138752026

Filing Number

MCRC/5861/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3382/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

EXCISE Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANIRAM MAHANT

    Adv. ISHWAR JAISWAL,SYED MAJID ALI,SYED MAJID ALI, ,SHREYA JAISWAL,SHREYA JAISWAL,ISHWAR CHANDRA,ABHISHEK SARAF,SYED MAJID ALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Shaniram Mahant, arrested under the C.G. Excise Act for allegedly selling 40 liters of Mahua liquor. The court considered his custody duration since 14.03.2026, the pending investigation, and considerable trial timeline, while imposing conditions including furnishing personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, and restrictions on seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3382/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Shaniram Mahant, arrested under the C.G. Excise Act for allegedly selling 40 liters of Mahua liquor. The court considered his custody duration since 14.03.2026, the pending investigation, and considerable trial timeline, while imposing conditions including furnishing personal bond with two sureties, mandatory court attendance, and restrictions on seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case