VISHESHAR @ GOLU AGARIYA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3439/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010138532026

Filing Number

MCRC/5846/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3439/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHESHAR @ GOLU AGARIYA

    Adv. Hemant Kumar Agrawal,SHIVAM AGRAWAL,SHIVAM AGRAWAL, ,SURBHI YADAV,SURBHI YADAV,SURBHI YADAV,SHIVAM AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF

    MCRC 3439/2026 Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Visheshar @ Golu Agariya, arrested for alleged rape and child sexual abuse offenses under BNS and POCSO Act. The court found the case fit for bail considering that the victim's statement denies the accused's involvement, no medical injuries were found, the victim's mother didn't support prosecution, and the applicant had been in custody since October 2025 with trial expected to take considerable time. Bail was granted on Rs. 25,000 personal bond with one surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3439/2026

casestatus.in Summary

MCRC 3439/2026 Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Visheshar @ Golu Agariya, arrested for alleged rape and child sexual abuse offenses under BNS and POCSO Act. The court found the case fit for bail considering that the victim's statement denies the accused's involvement, no medical injuries were found, the victim's mother didn't support prosecution, and the applicant had been in custody since October 2025 with trial expected to take considerable time. Bail was granted on Rs. 25,000 personal bond with one surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case