DHANESH MAHIPAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3432/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010138502026

Filing Number

MCRC/5843/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3432/2026

Registration Date

13-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHANESH MAHIPAL

    Adv. Pranjal Agrawal,VIDHI AGRAWAL,VIDHI AGRAWAL, ,VIDHI AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Case Summary: MCRC/3432/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Dhanesh Mahipal, accused of house invasion, robbery, and causing grievous hurt to a 65-year-old woman. The court found that despite serious allegations—including snatching a gold chain worth ₹1,20,000 and inflicting forearm fracture injuries—no recovery of the stolen item from the applicant's possession was made, the chargesheet was already filed, and further custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The court released him on personal bond with two sureties, imposing strict conditions regarding court attendance and non-adjournment of evidence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3432/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCRC/3432/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted bail to Dhanesh Mahipal, accused of house invasion, robbery, and causing grievous hurt to a 65-year-old woman. The court found that despite serious allegations—including snatching a gold chain worth ₹1,20,000 and inflicting forearm fracture injuries—no recovery of the stolen item from the applicant's possession was made, the chargesheet was already filed, and further custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The court released him on personal bond with two sureties, imposing strict conditions regarding court attendance and non-adjournment of evidence proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case