LOKURAM SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3239/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010138462026

Filing Number

WPS/8005/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3239/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LOKURAM SAHU

    Adv. F.S.KHARE,RAM KUMAR TIWARI,RAM KUMAR TIWARI, ,MAMTA MAHILANGE,NILU KUMARI SINGH,RAM KUMAR TIWARI

  2. 2.Khemuram Bhupatra

  3. 3.Horilal Prajapati

  4. 4.Ashok Kumar Verma

  5. 5.Shyam Kumar Chandravanshi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Engineer in Chief

  3. 3.Chief Engineer

  4. 4.Executive Engineer (E and M)

  5. 5.Executive Engineer

  6. 6.Joint Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of a petition filed by five retired government employees who were denied leave encashment benefits. The court permitted the petitioners to submit a fresh representation, and directed the state respondents to consider and decide their claim within three months in accordance with the law, citing the precedent set in Faguvaram Patel v. State of C.G. (2022). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3239/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of a petition filed by five retired government employees who were denied leave encashment benefits. The court permitted the petitioners to submit a fresh representation, and directed the state respondents to consider and decide their claim within three months in accordance with the law, citing the precedent set in Faguvaram Patel v. State of C.G. (2022). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case