SUSHIL GILHARE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3247/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010138282026

Filing Number

MCRC/5835/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRC/3247/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHIL GILHARE

    Adv. RAHIL ARUN KOCHAR,GYAN PRAKASH DANDEKAR,GYAN PRAKASH DANDEKAR, ,RENU KOCHAR,RENU KOCHAR,ARUN KUMAR KOCHAR,GYAN PRAKASH DANDEKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the bail application of Sushil Gilhare, arrested under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956. The court found that the applicant was merely found standing at the entrance gate (not inside the premises in compromising condition), while co-accused persons already granted bail were found inside; additionally, the charge-sheet was filed and trial would take considerable time. The court released him on personal bond with two sureties subject to conditions including regular court attendance and no adjournment-seeking without sufficient cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/3247/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the bail application of Sushil Gilhare, arrested under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956. The court found that the applicant was merely found standing at the entrance gate (not inside the premises in compromising condition), while co-accused persons already granted bail were found inside; additionally, the charge-sheet was filed and trial would take considerable time. The court released him on personal bond with two sureties subject to conditions including regular court attendance and no adjournment-seeking without sufficient cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case