SURAJ SINGH MAKKAD vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1048/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010138232026

Filing Number

CRMP/5832/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRMP/1048/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

APPLICATION U/S 528 OF B.N.S.S. 2023 ( 1411 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURAJ SINGH MAKKAD

    Adv. INDRAPREET KAUR CHHABRA,RAVINDRA SINGH CHHABRA,RAVINDRA SINGH CHHABRA, ,RAMKRISHNA KASHYAP,INDRAPREET KAUR CHHABRA,ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI,ASHUTOSH DWIVEDI,SAHDEV YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Siddharth Baid

  3. 3.Leena Baid

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petitioner's petition to quash the FIR and charge sheet in a case involving allegations of criminal intimidation, extortion, and conspiracy related to forced property sales. The court found that the grave allegations prima facie disclose serious cognizable offences and held that execution of registered sale deeds through banking channels does not negate coercion claims, nor do pending civil suits bar criminal prosecution for the same acts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/1048/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed the petitioner's petition to quash the FIR and charge sheet in a case involving allegations of criminal intimidation, extortion, and conspiracy related to forced property sales. The court found that the grave allegations prima facie disclose serious cognizable offences and held that execution of registered sale deeds through banking channels does not negate coercion claims, nor do pending civil suits bar criminal prosecution for the same acts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case